RE:What keeps you 'chained' to the bible or to a religious dogma
(Date Posted:04/29/2008 4:21 PM)
Yeah Blood Oath!...you could easily say that the bible people were very superstitious (and still are!). There is all sorts of stuff in the bible - its a very BIG book. There's astrology and all kinds of magical thinking presented. I don't see that number can have a 'spiritual' quality - they are quantitative symbols. But the inventor Ivan Panin certainly considers his own ideas as proof................from Wiki Bible Numerics is the study of numerical patterns in the Bible (particularly involving the number seven) and the use of particular numbers to represent certain concepts. It was pioneered by Ivan Panin from around 1890 until his death in 1942. It was considered by Panin proof that the Bible is divinely inspired, and some modern Christians share this view................ Some Christians regard Bible numerics as irrefutable proof that the Bible is divinely inspired. Those who believe in Bible numerics have used it to "prove" the authenticity and divine inspiration of controversial Bible passages such as Mark 16 (the last portion of Mark 16 is very important to some Christians, particularly in the Pentecostal movement, but is considered by many to have not been included in the original Gospel of Mark). ..................................... I don't quite know what you mean about 'a standard of number symbolism'. ? Maybe they were just shitty writers and plagiarized each other - there are countless alternative explanations. Which language is used? I think if you come at it from the perspective that you 'believe' you will tend to find what you are looking for. Ramsey theory - informs that basically if the project - the set/graph/collection of words/whatever is large enough, you'll be guaranteed to find patches of order as large as you want. (ie bible) You might be aware of this site.. http://cs.anu.edu.au/~bdm/codes/moby.html ? I'd be more impressed if the bible numerics produced new and current predictions. No credit for picking your own vague collection of thousands of words and claiming 'success' when some of them happen to match past events that have already happened. I'm curious why the revivalists put forward this kind of thing. I'm assuming it would be more popular with the males in the congregation ? - as something to 'worry about' or keep people busy enough with this stuff so they don't THINK about other stuff? I have no idea really.....except to compare this kind of queer maths with the other more horrendous 'theories' the revivalist liked to push....ie. the British Israel 'theory' which I assume has crawled somewhat under the dirty revivalist carpet these days? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revival_Centres_InternationalThe entry makes it sound ever so sqeaky clean?  You could say 'speaking in tongues' is used by certain christian as 'proof' - amazing how much 'proof' the faithful really rely on to operate ....
(Message edited by snakechic on 04/29/2008 4:26 PM)
--------------------------------------------------------------
In exchange for obedience, Christianity promises salvation in an afterlife; but in order to elicit obedience through this promise, Christianity must convince people that they need salvation, that there is something to be saved from. Christianity has nothing to offer a happy person living in a natural, intelligible universe. If Christianity is to gain a motivational foothold, it must declare war on earthly pleasure and happiness, and this, historically, has been its precise course of action. In the eyes of Christianity, woman(man) is sinful and helpless in the face of God, and is potential fuel for the flames of hell. Just as Christianity must destroy reason before it can introduce faith, so it must destroy happiness before it can introduce salvation.
-- George H Smith, Atheism: The Case Against God
|