Abuse Report
1 .  Thread's URL
2 .  Comment
3 .  Your Name
4 .  E-mail
    




User Name   Password
This is a support forum for those who have left
or are in the process of leaving fundamentalist Christianity

Current Forum Since June 2001


Views:318     

<<Previous ThreadNext Thread>>
Page 1 of 1    
Author Comment
snakechic
| Move to Bottom
 
Author



Rank:none
Status:
Score: 0
Posts: 3507
From:
Registered: 11/02/2004
Time spent: 6158 hours

(Date Posted:11/16/2005 02:57:52)

I'm having difficulty with the concept of blasphemy.How come a human being can blasphem against something that no human being is supposed to 'know' about?Ok...its seems that within a set of communication transactions with a fundy there are set rules. Andthose rulesseems to be shifting according to the idea of what blasphemy is for that individual. In other words ...fundies often say 'don't blasphem' to me as a way to control the conversation.What is all that about do you think?

--------------------------------------------------------------
In exchange for obedience, Christianity promises salvation in an afterlife; but in order to elicit obedience through this promise, Christianity must convince people that they need salvation, that there is something to be saved from. Christianity has nothing to offer a happy person living in a natural, intelligible universe. If Christianity is to gain a motivational foothold, it must declare war on earthly pleasure and happiness, and this, historically, has been its precise course of action. In the eyes of Christianity, woman(man) is sinful and helpless in the face of God, and is potential fuel for the flames of hell. Just as Christianity must destroy reason before it can introduce faith, so it must destroy happiness before it can introduce salvation.

-- George H Smith, Atheism: The Case Against God

Shadowself
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
1#



Status:
From:
Registered: 01/16/2004
Time spent: 1773 hours


(Date Posted:11/16/2005 03:08:59)

Saying "don't blaspheme" is the fundy way of saying "don't disagree with me", or "don't offend me".  Though they say you are offending God with whatever you are saying/doing.  Guess they speak for God.  We're all in trouble then; we blaspheme every day when we don't pray, don't go to church, don't read the Bible, etc. 

--------------------------------------------------------------
A big revelation in my professional training was that humans can learn skills for living and relating. We don"t have to be desperate for a miracle of God to make us decent.--Marlene Winell

Voltaire
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
2#



Rank:none
Status:
Score:0
Posts:1490
From:
Registered: 07/08/2001
Time spent: 0 hours


(Date Posted:11/16/2005 07:16:42)



Guess they speak for God.






And that in itself is blasphemous!

--------------------------------------------------------------
Zombies, Unicorns, Devils, Sea Monsters, Satyrs, Dragons, Six Winged Angels, Gods, Demons, Witches, Astrologers, A walking & talking snake, Magical fruit, Talking donkeys, human headed six-winged beasts, Ghosts. All that stuff is in the Bible and yet they tell me it"s not mythology?

spitfire1979
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
3#



Status:
From:
Registered: 08/17/2005
Time spent: 0 hours


(Date Posted:11/16/2005 22:16:46)

Reply to : shadowself



We're all in trouble then; we blaspheme every day when we don't pray, don't go to church, don't read the Bible, etc. 




 


exactly!  i think i even heard that invitation-decision inducing statement at fundy church and church camp!  such spiritual lack of interest has also been referred to as committing adultery against god since supposedly we're his hold bride.  in fundy circles where separation from the world is the core ingredient to their dogma and control, terms like 'blasphemy' are choke collars that keep believers from walking too far away from the church's influence.

VorJack
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
4#



Rank:none
Status:
Score:0
Posts:21
From:
Registered: 10/14/2004
Time spent: 0 hours


(Date Posted:11/17/2005 05:23:24)

Apparently, according to Leonard Levy's Blasphemy: Verbal Offense Against the Sacred, the word blasphemy lost any real meaning during the formative stages of christianity. The early church fathers threw it - and just about every other insult they could think of - at other church fathers and assorted sects and heretics. It came to mean simply any behavior or language that the speaker disagreed with.



So, I suppose nothing has really changed in 2000 years of so.
Voltaire
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
5#



Rank:none
Status:
Score:0
Posts:1490
From:
Registered: 07/08/2001
Time spent: 0 hours


(Date Posted:11/17/2005 08:42:21)

I was going by the only definition of blasphemy that has a biblical precedent, which is claiming to be god when you're not. There's actually two definitions of blasphemy in the dictionary:



1 a : the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for God b : the act of claiming the attributes of deity.



2 : irreverence toward something considered sacred or inviolable.



Definition 1a is the one I was using. When someone "speaks for god" it certainly seems to me that they're stepping into his place.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Zombies, Unicorns, Devils, Sea Monsters, Satyrs, Dragons, Six Winged Angels, Gods, Demons, Witches, Astrologers, A walking & talking snake, Magical fruit, Talking donkeys, human headed six-winged beasts, Ghosts. All that stuff is in the Bible and yet they tell me it"s not mythology?

snakechic
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
6#



Rank:none
Status:
Score:0
Posts:3507
From:
Registered: 11/02/2004
Time spent: 6158 hours


(Date Posted:11/20/2005 05:42:40)

Thanks guys.....Vorjack I looked it up...sounds like a very  interesting book.


Freedom of speech......and the 'sin' of Saying the name of "bush' in vain.....or watching and creating films like.the Monty Python movie etc


I don't know the holy spirit seems to be of greater importance than god? Exodus 22.28 versus Luke 12:10 - its all a bit wishy washy.....from ricdicule to swearing? The holy ghost is nothing but a rapist according to the fable of mary and jospeh!


http://www.answers.com/topic/blasphemy


Quotes from web page:-http://uuchurch.uwctl.org/Archive%20Sermons/blasphemy.pdf


THE LAST MAN JAILED FOR BLASPHEMY


Unitarian Universalist Church of Muncie, IN. February 18, 2000.


?Copyright 2000 By Thomas M. Perchlik


- SERMON -


The Greek philosopher Socrates, the Reformation theologian Michael Servetus,


The Greek philosopher Socrates, the Reformation theologian Michael Servetus,


even the Rabbi, Jesus of Nazareth, all were condemned and executed for the crime of


Blasphemy, the crime of speaking against God, or any verbal offense against the sacred.


Leonard Levy, in his book titled Blasphemy notes that, "For most of history blasphemers


have actually been devout Christians." The last man who served jail time for the crime of


blasphemy was an ex-Universalist Minister named Abner Kneeland. The hope is that


Kneeland will remain forever the last man so jailed. But this hope is not yet assured


since most states and the United Kingdom have retained blasphemy laws on their books


.......


Monty Python's Life of Brian came out small-minded


religious leaders condemned it as blasphemy. Now, if you haven't see the movie there is


one scene where Jesus is giving his sermon on the mount. However, way at the back of


the crowd there are a few characters who can't hear his words very well. "What's he


saying?" asks one. "He says, ?Blessed are the cheese-makers,'" replies another. "What?


What is so special about cheese-makers?" the first protests. The other responds,


"Obviously it is meant to refer to all makers of dairy products in general." The movie is


a condemnation of foolishly pious and confused religious people. There is no comment


on Jesus in the film at all. But the scene at the end that especially troubled some of the


devout was where Brian and several others are being crucified on crosses. They all begin


singing "Always look on the bright side of life." This was seen as some sort of mockery


of Jesus dying nobly on the cross for our sins. But of course the Romans killed thousands


of people by crucifixion, some of which may have hummed little tunes as they died.


Ultra-conservative Christians have condemned movies like The Last Temptation of


Christ, and more recently Dogma, as insulting to not only Catholicism, but to Christianity


in general.


Loved both of those movies...blasphemy laws are basically to limit freedom of speech? ok....

--------------------------------------------------------------
In exchange for obedience, Christianity promises salvation in an afterlife; but in order to elicit obedience through this promise, Christianity must convince people that they need salvation, that there is something to be saved from. Christianity has nothing to offer a happy person living in a natural, intelligible universe. If Christianity is to gain a motivational foothold, it must declare war on earthly pleasure and happiness, and this, historically, has been its precise course of action. In the eyes of Christianity, woman(man) is sinful and helpless in the face of God, and is potential fuel for the flames of hell. Just as Christianity must destroy reason before it can introduce faith, so it must destroy happiness before it can introduce salvation.

-- George H Smith, Atheism: The Case Against God

spitfire1979
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
7#



Status:
From:
Registered: 08/17/2005
Time spent: 0 hours


(Date Posted:11/20/2005 22:00:56)

Reply to : snakechic



.or watching and creating films like.the Monty Python movie etcI don't know the holy spirit seems to be of greater importance than god?


"the life of brian"..... haven't seen it but it's the only python film i haven't seen.  my fundy bro (he's 21) was/is a huge fan, but with LOB he does consider it blasphemous.  i started calling his hippie "jesus sandals"  "bryan sandals" after he called me out for taking god's name in vain and he STILL thought it was blasphemous, because to him, bryan was a representation of christ,. albeit "blasphemous", so any mention of brian was also blasphemous as it intoned the name of the good lord in a negative, flighty fashion.    guess......there's no real blasphemy involved, only the appearance of it (winkwinknudgenudgeknow-whu-i-mean-know-whu-i-mean...)
Shadowself
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
8#



Status:
From:
Registered: 01/16/2004
Time spent: 1773 hours


(Date Posted:11/20/2005 23:34:46)

Reply to : spitfire1979



(winkwinknudgenudgeknow-whu-i-mean-know-whu-i-mean...)


Say no more!

--------------------------------------------------------------
A big revelation in my professional training was that humans can learn skills for living and relating. We don"t have to be desperate for a miracle of God to make us decent.--Marlene Winell

redzed
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom
 
9#



Rank:none
Status:
Score:0
Posts:500
From:
Registered: 09/21/2002
Time spent: 0 hours


(Date Posted:11/21/2005 15:05:31)

Reply to : snakechic




Loved both of those movies...blasphemy laws are basically to limit freedom of speech? ok....





Sounds a lot like the sedition laws being imposed on Aussies in the guise of anti-terrorism!  Seem to recall the only unforgiveable sin was blasphemy against the holy spirit, and as I understood it that was to do with attributing the works of god to satan?


Snakechic, that's a good question: "How come a human being can blasphem against something that no human being is supposed to 'know' about?" and one I was pondering.  If satan can appear as an angel of light, and is apparently so deceptive that even the very elect could be deceived, how could one know?  Indeed how could one hope to know a god of the kind proposed by fundamentalist thinking?  It's difficult enough to know one's own partner, or friends, even though we may have known them intimately for long periods.  How then is one to 'know' a god one cannot see, touch or feel?

--------------------------------------------------------------
Albert Einstein: "A human being is a part of the whole, called by us "Universe" a part limited in time and space. He experiences himself, his thoughts and feelings as something separated from the rest--a kind of optical delusion of his consciousness. This delusion is a kind of prison for us, restricting us to our personal desires and affection for a few persons nearest us."



Namaste

Shadowself
| Move to Top | Move to Bottom